On 1 Apr 2012 at 12:05, ben wrote:
  SOME SAY THAT ONE , SHOULD NOT BE A PRIME NUMBER.
 COMMENTS WELCOME. 
 EUCLID DIDN'T DEFINE 1 AS A NUMBER.  HE CALLED IT A "MONAS" OR
"UNIT"
 AND THAT A NUMBER WAS A MULTIPLE OF UNITS.  SO THE PROBLEM DIDN'T
 OCCUR FOR HIM.   SOME HAVE CALLED ONE A PRIME, BUT DOING SO MAKES FOR
 TOO MUCH MESS.  THE CURRENT DEFINITION OF A PRIME NUMBER NOW USUALLY
 SAYS SOMETHING TO THE EFFCT OF "...A NATURAL NUMBER GREATER THAN
 ONE...".