18 Apr
2002
18 Apr
'02
12:33 p.m.
--- "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
Mathematically, yes. I was attempting to write an English decription.
In the spirit of this "pecker contest"
(as a former boss of mine would
call it), let me suggest the "ultimate" metric for bragging rights...
cubic-foot-BTU/Hr-lb-amps per KByte-MIPS.
Should that read cubicfoot * BTU/Hr * pounds * (amps/KByte) * MIPS ? Should be WATTs rather than AMPs, since the power
consumption is the key
issue, not the current.
Sure. I thought about that, but I was already down the page and didn't
want to go back and re-do it. Guess I should have.
In the interest of international relations, should we
switch to KG
instead of pounds?
Machts Nichts to me.
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/