Rich Alderson wrote:
From: Tom
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:23 PM
Interesting article about the 40th anniversary of
the progenitor of many modern operating systems.
It even mentions our very own Al Kossow,
"One holy grail that eluded us for a long
time
was the first edition of Unix in any form,
electronic or otherwise. Then, in 2006, Al Kossow
_Pace_ Warren, this is *NOT* "the first edition of Unix in any form".
This paper by the same author is far more detailed:
What Al found is the ____PDP-11____ version of Unix.
The *FIRST* edition
was written in PDP-7 assembler cross-compiled on a GE 635, and as far as
DMR could tell was completely lost.
The paper I indicated explains all this. But it seems that "first
edition" refers to the manual instead of the software.
Sorry, but as curator for the only (known) running
PDP-7 on the planet,
I'd be a lot more interested in that.
I had the impression that someone had announced this about a year or so
back. I looked at the listing but didn't pay too much attention. At the
time I thought I was looking at PDP-7 assembly (I am reasonably familiar
with the PDP-1 and PDP-11 and so would be unlikely to confuse the 7 and
11 even with a quick glance) but reading the paper it sure seems like I
actually saw the PDP-11 material described there.
This is very odd. I tried to remember where I saw this, but the obvious
places don't have it:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/bellLabs/unix/
The link in the article doesn't seem to be what I had seen:
http://code.google.com/p/unix-jun72/
The link there to the scanned document goes back to the bitsavers
directory I had mentioned, so it is likely my memory is playing tricks
on me and that this was a little longer ago than I remembered and
PDP-11. Looking at the text it doesn't look familiar, specially the
extensive "man pages" section. Very odd....
("1st Edition" Unix for the PDP-11 is cool,
but I'm going to insist on
accuracy from the professionals, and Warren is very much a professional.)
The difference between "first Unix" and "first edition Unix" is
subtle,
but accurate. It is also misleading for the general public, so I see
your point.
-- Jecel