From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
I've been working on my car project
(
http://wps.com/AMC/1970-AMC-Hornet/index.html) because car season
is coming up soon enough, but I peeled time out for the Nova here
and there.
I originally repaired a popped +5V logic bypass cap on the
Read/Write Board, (some monolithic ceramic job), and changed all
the funky old caps for new ceramic disks. That worked for 20 - 40
hours of operation without a single error. Disk had formatted with
zero media defects. Then the disk started throwing read errors
that moved around (bad blocks later good; more and more bad
blocks...). Diagnostics never indicated any error other than read
errors; seek, format, diags all run 100% perfect except read
errors.
I suspect the Read/Write Board. So I ordered modern monolithic
replacements for the remaining old mono chips from Digikey, and
shotgunned all the old electrolytics etc for good measure, in two
places electrolytics replaced with tantalums (didn't have
.82uF's).
Install board with all new chips and alcohol wash, format -- hard
100% read failure! D'OH! Long story short, I found internal +6V
was not; turns out I installed a tant backwards. doh. New tant,
+6V fine.
Formats, reads OK, then errors again! Sheesh! System has been on
for two hours (I'm getting paranoid, so temp stabilize the whole
thing); halted diags, loaded disk heads, installed drive cover,
pushed into the rack, left for an hour for the drive temp to
stabilize (this is a religious rite, might as well kill a chicken)
then format and test again.
After warm-up, it's worse. Signals all through the path look
OK, hot and cold. I can see no difference, but this is 10 MHz
NRZ data, in a two-state amp with AGC. I think I'm screwed.
The R/W board is a piece of work too. I suspect it's an early
revision, as the board is a hack job, covered in cut traces,
components and jumpers on the bottom, and there's a !#$%!! trimpot
crammed in somewhere as well as kludgey RC (lopass) networks in
some digital logic. Plus, the PC board was milled out for access
to a middle layer. Not Good. Plus, it doesn't match the schematic
(though it's close enough to poke around in with a scope).
Photos of the nasty board here,
http://wps.com/NOVA4/pitchas.html
About halfway down.
Anyone got a spare board?!
Hi Tom
Most of these old circuits used 1-shots to decode things.
Take a look at these to see if the timings seem reasonable.
Most have pulse widths around 0.7RC.
Dwight