Pentium III,
hell the K6-2/450 here with Solaris 8 beat the
UltraSparc10 (300MHZ)... (gcc compile and build of an object over NFS with
the same server).
Amazing that my home toy outperforms the work box.
Both had IDE drives and 128mb memory.
(Personally, I prefer FreeBSD on the K6... but that wasn't what I was
testing in the benchmark)...
Bill
Now, you want the really scarry part? Price what it would cost you to get a
nice SparcStation 20 (5 year old system) with say 1 SM71 CPU, 128MB RAM, 4GB
HD, and 8-Bit graphics. Then price what you can get if you go buy *new* PC
hardware that will run Solaris! Shoot, just price a nice SS20 on eBay then
the PC hardware at your local shop, even that can be scarry!
Zane
Which is why all my Sparcs are dumpster dive refugees (Sparc2's some
with Sparc-UP double clocking. A Sparc10's still a useful machine to
me, since it runs Solaris 8 and can run FrameMaker...
Unfortunately, Adobe stopped supporting Frame on x86 Unix in the 2.x
timeframe and I'm stuck with (ugh) Win9x/NT/2k or my time limited Linux
demos that run out this month...
I've got a 420R at work -- and I think a multicpu PIII would put it to
shame in the price/performance area.
That's why I was deploying dual boot Linux/FreeBSD/Solaris8 and Win9x/NT
boxes at work... The best of both worlds.
Bill
--
bpechter(a)monmouth.com | FreeBSD since 1.0.2, Linux since 0.99.10
| Unix Sys Admin since Sys V/BSD 4.2
| Windows System Administration: "Magical Misery Tour"