3 Apr
2000
3 Apr
'00
6 a.m.
> Or another thing: maybe just copy only the real
name part
> into the archives and skip the address at all (remember
> it's ["]name["] <address>) ? So you only need to come
> up with generated names for users who don't use a name
> part in the from header. Couldn't this be a solution ?
> Address harvesters can't find usefull addresses, while,
> as usual, the people show their face (name). Or is there
> any reason to put up a mask ?
The default spammode would list a header as such:
To: classiccmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Mailing list archives? Questions...
From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:39:09 +1
In-reply-to:
<Pine.LNX.4.04.10004021322380.21968-100000(a)is1.wfi-inc.com>
Organization: SIEMENS AG
Reply-To: classiccmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-classiccmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The individual still has his/her name attached, just
no email address...
Well, I'm still not a fan of it, but the solution is acceptable.
Thank you
Servus
Hans
--
VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe