3 Apr
2000
3 Apr
'00
5:29 a.m.
> Why not, this may be a possible solution - is
there a chance to
> opt in for unchanged address on both archives ?
Do you mean changing/not changing addresses for
individual messgage based
on sender? Not in my simple world. The Mhonarc email-->html software is
written in perl, so it'd be easy to implement special rules like
that...but it's more than I want to do right now (I have enough on my
plate).
Well, I see your point. Maybe just keep my request in mind
if you ever may find spare time to add the functionality.
I'd realy apreciate this service.
Or another thing: maybe just copy only the real name part
into the archives and skip the address at all (remember
it's ["]name["] <address>) ? So you only need to come
up with generated names for users who don't use a name
part in the from header. Couldn't this be a solution ?
Address harvesters can't find usefull addresses, while,
as usual, the people show their face (name). Or is there
any reason to put up a mask ?
The votes tallied so far would dictate that the
addresses be obfuscated on
any public archive. I will seriously consider creating a public and
private archive, but I'm not sure how I'd create a user list for it. Maybe
something as simple as having an email-address as the access code and
searching for it in the archives.
You need to secure all pages, not only some start pages.
Links can spread fast, and soon some spider will follow
the trail.
Gruss
H.
--
VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe