29 May
2011
29 May
'11
1:36 p.m.
On 5/29/11 3:51 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
...which is a big part of what we've got now..
By MPP I'm
assuming you mean message-passing parallelism? As
opposed to symmetric multi-processing?
Massive systems. Remember when we were all supposed to have oodles of little
processors we could throw at any problem?
Well, *some* problems. Nobody in the game (well, nobody who knew
what they were talking about) was ever under any illusions that all
problems could effectively map to a massively parallel system.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL