There has been talk on and off of producing a QBus board with an FPGA and an
SD interface to make an RQDX-3 emulator (or anything else I suppose). That
is something that would be really interesting to do, but perhaps it would be
possible to create an FPGA board that implemented the ST506 interface
instead. Either would be great projects as I too suffer from a dearth of
RD53s and RD54s.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rod Smallwood
Sent: 28 February 2011 08:51
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only'
Subject: RE: SCSI -1 to IDE and SD project
Hi
Thank you for a most interesting reply. Despite having been around when
the transitions between interface types happened, there was a lot I did
not
know. The fact that the ST506 interface was derived
from 8" floppy
technology was news to me.
I collect DEC equipment and all of the MFM drives DEC sold were OEM
badge jobs. There were three DEC RQDX MFM controllers I know of. I have a
RQDX-1 and a couple of RQDX-3's. I have never seen a RQDX-2. All three are
for the Q-bus.
I have a few RD-53's but only one is reliable. The main logic board in an
RD-
53(Micropolis 1325) has a 8051 and a bunch of other
stuff. I can't see how
an interface board with an 8051 is regarded as dumb.
I am not short of SCSI drives in assorted physical sizes, capacities and
interface types. I also have a couple of third party Q-Bus SCSI
controllers.
Stating the obvious the above only applies to PDP11's. Yes I know you can
put a Q-bus controller in a Q-bus VAX.
So what's my problem? As with many collectors my goal is to get the
systems back to the state they were in when they left the factory. I start
with the model designation on the box label and try to restore back to
what
that defined.
I'll stretch a point insofar as I'll use any MFM drive that DEC bought the
OEM
version of regardless of if came from DEC. Even
allowing for that MFM
drives that RQDX controllers can handle are getting scarce.
So the problem is how the make an RQDX controller think its talking to an
RD series MFM drive when it isn't.
Rod Smallwood (G8DGR)
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-
bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew Lynch
Sent: 28 February 2011 00:18
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: SCSI -1 to IDE and SD project
Hi Rod,
I do not think an MFM/RLL (ST506/ST412) to IDE bridge board is feasible.
The SCSI-1 and IDE interfaces are purely digital and the drives are
intelligent
enough to abstract much of the realtime complexities
of communicating
with the hard drive itself. As a result the bridge board between the
SCSI-1
and IDE is relatively simple and a basic Z80 embedded
controller is able
to
accomplish the data transfer relatively easily. It is
well suited for a
community hobbyist project like the SCSI to IDE/SD bridge board we are
working on at
Vintage-Computer.com forums.
MFM/RLL (ST506/ST412) interfaces are a high speed extension of the
Shugart floppy drive interface with some additional signals. It is a hard
realtime interface and low level way to communicate with the hard drive.
As a result it would require an extremely sophisticated high speed
controller
to interpret the signals to and from the MFM/RLL
(ST506/ST412). A simple
Z80 or microcontroller based controller would not be able to accomplish
the
task in my opinion. It may be possible but I believe
it would be an
expensive
commercial device and probably quite rare.
The SCSI-1 to/from IDE/SD project is a hobbyist community project and I
think would be quite helpful to the wide array of legacy/vintage/classic
devices which use SCSI-1 drives. So far, I have heard from owners of the
obvious microcomputers like Atari, Amiga, Apple Mac, Sun workstations,
DEC, etc. However many other devices used SCSI-1 devices such as
synthesizers, a variety of test and lab equipment (?), sewing machines
(?),
photocopiers (?), and other devices I would have never
suspected used
SCSI-
1 drives.
At the moment, there are 6 builders with the prototype PCBs but none have
reported a working build yet. The parts are very common and the design
uses only "hobbyist friendly" construction for easy assembly. However,
the
software still needs to be written which should be
largely reuse of
existing
Z80 code from existing N8VEM projects. If you or
anyone else is
interested
in working on the project please contact me. I still
have 4 remaining
prototype PCBs. My goal is to get this project up and running before the
SCSI-1 drives become difficult to obtain such as 100 TPI floppy drives,
MFM/RLL (ST506/ST412) hard drives, and other uncommon storage medias.
All of the technical information on the project is available at the N8VEM
wiki. It will be free/open and publicly posted for community benefit like
the
rest of the N8VEM boards. Please read the existing
technical
documentation
before critiquing the design.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder
<http://n8vem-
sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=MINI%20SCSI%20
to%20IDE%20prototypes>
¶m=MINI%20SCSI%20to%20IDE%20prototypes
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
SCSI -1 to IDE and SD project
Rod Smallwood rodsmallwood at
btconnect.com
<mailto:cctalk%40classiccmp.org?Subject=Re%3A%20SCSI%20-
1%20to%20IDE%20and%2
0SD%20project&In-Reply-
To=%3C5177DAA49B624EFD819C07F9E41EFFA8%40RODSDEVSYSTE
M%3E>
Tue Feb 22 02:36:34 CST 2011
* Previous message: GSX
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/297266.html>
porting project
* Next message: SCSI -1 to
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/297278.html> IDE
and SD project
* Messages sorted by: [ date ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/date.html#297263>
[ <http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/thread.html#297263>
thread ] [ subject ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/subject.html#297263>
[ author ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/author.html#297263>
_____
Hi
This looks interesting. As collector of DEC systems my need is
slightly
different insofar as due to the rapid disappearance of
ST506 (MFM) drives
I
need to make say an IDE drive look like a an ST506
drive to a DEC MFM
controller.
Whilst your SCSI to IDE is nice I'm not short of SCSI drives. However with
your experience you might like to comment on if you think a DEC MFM
controller to IDE drive converter box is feasible.
Regards
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org
<http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk> [mailto:cctech-
bounces at
classiccmp.org
<http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk> ] On Behalf Of
Andrew Lynch
Sent: 21 February 2011 14:39
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
<http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>
Subject: SCSI -1 to IDE and SD project
Hi! Several weeks ago there was a discussion on CCTALK about a free/open
SCSI to IDE and SD project. I designed a PCB using the Z53C80 and a Z80
with RAM/ROM/UART/IDE and SD. There is a prototype available waiting
for some interested builders to take on the project.
As far as I know none of the builders have a completed unit although I
think
if we had at least one working unit the project would
make some real
progress. I have four remaining SCSI to IDE/SD prototype boards so if
anyone would like to join the project as a software developer please let
me
know. I believe much of the software can be reused
from previous N8VEM
and/or other free/open software projects.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/page/35044530/PCB-Inventory
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
_____
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
* Previous message: GSX
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/297266.html>
porting project
* Next message: SCSI -1 to
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/297278.html> IDE
and SD project
* Messages sorted by: [ date ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-February/date.html#297263>
[ thread ] <http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/thread.html#297263> [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/subject.html#297263>
subject ] [ author ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2011-
February/author.html#297263>
_____
More <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk> information
about the cctalk mailing list
_____