15 Apr
2010
15 Apr
'10
11:37 a.m.
Al Kossow wrote:
On 4/15/10 5:04 AM, Brad Parker wrote:
Ok, I lied. Only
MAINDEC08_D5FA_PB_COPY2.BIN is broken.
./From_Vince_Slyngstad/maindec/maindec-08-d5fa-pb ok, same as #3
./papertapeImages/set1/MAINDEC08_D5FA_PB_COPY2.BIN bad
./papertapeImages/set8_20040316/tray1/maindec-08-d5fa-pb.bin ok, same as #1
./papertapeImages/set8_20040316/tray1/maindec-8i-d5fa-pb.bin ok, bigger
than 1 & 3
-rw-r--r-- 1 brad brad 7535 2010-04-15 11:30 maindec-08-d5fa-pb.bin.mem
-rw-r--r-- 1 brad brad 6646 2010-04-15 11:30
MAINDEC08_D5FA_PB_COPY2.BIN.mem
-rw-r--r-- 1 brad brad 7535 2010-04-15 11:30 maindec-08-d5fa-pb.mem
-rw-r--r-- 1 brad brad 13640 2010-04-15 11:30 maindec-8i-d5fa-pb.bin.mem
Apparently maindec-8i-d5fa is not the same as maindec-08-d5fa-pb but it does
appear maindec-08-d5fa-pb is ok.
Any chance there is a hard copy of the source? That would be very helpful.
sorry for the confusion.
-brad
--
-----------
Brad Parker
Heeltoe Consulting
http://www.heeltoe.com
781-483-3101
The archived copies of the paper tape have a
checksum error.
I did a quick sweep through
http://bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp-8 and there
are several copies. Are they all bad?
./From_Vince_Slyngstad/maindec/maindec-08-d5fa-pb
./papertapeImages/set1/MAINDEC08_D5FA_PB_COPY2.BIN
./papertapeImages/set1/maindec-08-d5fa-pb.lab.txt
./papertapeImages/set8_20040316/tray1/maindec-08-d5fa-pb.bin
./papertapeImages/set8_20040316/tray1/maindec-8i-d5fa-pb.bin