On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
At 09:42 AM 4/16/2013, geneb wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
Except "Well, our metadata is shit." I think he put that in there just
to let the professional archivists blow their coffee out their noses.
The hope is
to be blunt about it in order to not only be up front
about the problem, but to hopefully get volunteers to
provide/improve the metadata.
And is there a mechanism for that to happen?
I'm pretty sure it's straightforward to submit new metadata - however,
they're underingoing a commercial power upgrade at the moment and are
offline. When they're back up, I'd suggest creating an account and
see what they offer with regards to new submissions.
g.