Chuck Guzis wrote:
I still use wire-wrap. The finished product is easily
modifiable and
will turn in reliable performance for as long as I care to use it.
I've got the tools to do wire-wrap, but none of the boards, sockets or
hardware (it seems WW IC sockets have become rather difficult to
source). The long pins also tend to get in the way IMO...
To be honest, I prefer the RoadRunner point-to-point wiring pens.
They're a bit like wire-wrap, but you use enamelled copper wire which is
soldered to the component (or socket) pins like a PCB "ratsnest". Though
admittedly it is a good idea to use wiring guides (aka "wiring
castellations" -- they look a bit like the battlements on top of castle
towers) to keep the wires tidy. I usually have one of these between each
row of ICs, then route all the wiring inside them -- it keeps things
much tidier, though it's not as easy to trace a fault.
Replacing resistors etc. is usually best done by nipping off the old
component pins at the body of the part, and soldering the new part to
the stubs... it's very much a one-shot prototyping system.
One of these days I need to find some software that can take an CAD
netlist and produce a wire-wrap wiring list using the "top and bottom"
technique (that is, wires are "on top" at one end and "on the bottom"
at
the other, thus making any changes possible with the removal of at most
one wire). I know this has been done in the past, though I don't think
any of the EDA software that did it has survived... :(
(Even if it was designed for Wire-Wrap, it might be useful for the
Roadrunner system too)
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/