On 11 August 2010 20:45, Dan Roganti <ragooman at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Tony Duell <ard at
p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
You know you've been hardware-hackign too long when all you can think of is
the Quine McClusky minimalisation method...
and whether ?P?NP ? ?:)
Indeed!
Charlie Stross wrote an excellent short story about this once, called
/Antibodies./ It's on Scribd here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23396346/Charles-Stross-Antibodies
After that, it's kind of a *relief* that apparently P<>NP. (Although
also a disappointment.)
OTOH, there are many issues with the proof:
http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/08/11/0239209/Possible-Issues-With-the…
--
Liam Proven ? Profile & links:
http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at
gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven ? MSN: lproven at
hotmail.com ? ICQ: 73187508