8 Jun
2013
8 Jun
'13
10:41 a.m.
>> THIS MESSAGE IS PROTECTED BY THE ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT, 18
>> U.S.C. ?? 2510 ET SEQ. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OR
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
No idea. I didn't even know about this act...I
think I should have.
Why?
Legal citations in email signatures are not likely to have any voracity.
I still get spam that has a disclaimer at the end asserting that, based on
some non-existent congressional act, it "can not legally be considered
spam" because it has a link in it that purports to remove you from the
mailing list. (more likely appends you to a "validated" list)
--
g at xenosoft.com Disclaimer: I speak for nobody else, and I can't even
_---_ | speak for me. All of my personalities and the spirits
/[@ @]\ | that I channel deny all knowledge of my activities.
oOO--(_)--OOo | In fact, they hate my guts. (except with garlic & butter)
``` ''' | For NSA or law enforcment officials monitoring the net:
pressure cooker, drone, cia, tea-party, dea, flight school, hacker,
homeland security, Wikileaks, nsa, IRS, sex, drugs, and rock'nroll.