On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sean Caron <scaron at umich.edu> wrote:
+1. I'm on a few lists and there's always one
or two guys that have to be
pedantic and play semantics police.
Indeed. And it's more than one or two, just sayin'.
I for one didn't mind making the inductive leap to
discern that you were
talking about MICROSOFT Windows.
> > >Ethan Dicks wrote:
> >>> Cool. I wasn't on CompuServe then...
> >>
> >> Much the same content, but all pre-Windows.
And given the context was *using CompuServe*, semantic bit-splitting
aside, what other "Windows" might one be talking about?
-ethan