On Thursday 27 July 2006 11:58, Roy J. Tellason
wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:51 am, Doc Shipley
wrote:
> We now have mebibytes, kibibytes, and other associated crap
>instead of proper terminology. If you read much open-source
>literature or docs, that spec is becoming disturbingly common.
Euw.
>http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
>
> Can you tell I'm not thrilled?
I don't like those much either. :-(
Yeah, who'd ever want simple clarity? It's SOO much more fun to
have no idea whether someone means 300,000,000 or 314,572,800 when
they say "300MB".
Yes but 300MB is usually attached to something and then you know
what it means... "Context" :)