11 May
2005
11 May
'05
9:08 a.m.
"vrs" wrote:
I actually think the task is only manageable if you virtualize a processor
that is more amenable to C. Which is also time-inefficient, but could
potentially be at least a little more space-efficient. (Maybe a 24-bit two
operand machine? Or something like a Nova, but 24 bit?)
heh. I remember puzzling at the the "pushj"'s and "popj"'s in
the FOCAL
source code. This was before I had seen a pdp-11 or dec-10.
Does anyone have the source for FOCAL on line? I used something called
FOCARL and COLPAC also, derivatives created by some smart guys at
Carleton College.
-brad