I don't know about you, but ALL my property, even the contents of my dumpster,
is worth more than the life, or, in fact, the combined lives, of all the thieves
in the world. They effectively relinquished their right to life by stealing
your right to property and privacy.
You can plug a thief any time you like, provided you don't allow the appearance
that he's trying to escape. If you don't kill him, you should be charged with
discharing a firearm into a public nuissance.
Nobody should be in your house unless you wish it so. If they are, and they
refuse to leave the premises, and leave YOUR property behind, they should be
dealt with appropriately. YOU, as the offended party, get to decide whether
that involves the local authorities or not.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Ford" <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Hackers: Computer Outlaws revisited
>You're right, Mike, but people who trespassing
onto the "attractive
nuissance"
should be shot
before they drown.
You have YOUR stuff and I have MINE. You have your private space and I have
mine. I have both the right and responsibility to protect my private
space and
my property. The courts have upheld the property owner's right to apply
deadly
force in protecting his/her own life/property. This presents an option to
other
When did this happen? Everything I have read says property no, life or
injury yes, ie somebody trashing your car you don't get to shoot. I have no
property worth someones life.