Everybody saying 'not I' does not alter the fact that a priceless piece of
computer history is at best missing and at worst destroyed.
The real point is that the computer museum people knew of its existence and
yet failed in their duty to recover and save it after the DECUS event.
Shame on you all!!
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Hilpert
Sent: 17 June 2009 19:11
To: General at invalid.domain; Discussion at invalid.domain :On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Stanford's PDP-6 ( was Re: Hardware Hobbyists vs.
EmulatorJockeys)
Al Kossow wrote:
I'm resending this with a revised title so someone has a chance of finding
this again in the future. I sent a similar message to alt.sys.pdp10 when
the subject came up last time.
Al Kossow wrote:
> Brent Hilpert wrote:
>> Rich Alderson wrote:
>>> On the other hand, the last PDP-6 in existence was destroyed by the
>>> Computer
>>> Museum in Boston about 20 years ago, so you're one up there.
>>
>> OK, I don't think I've heard this story.
>> Someone contributing to Wikipedia seems to want to tangentially
>> counter it,
>> without explaining the background story.
>
> That would be me, a CHM employee, that has access to all of the Boston
> museum
> collection records. I have spoken to several of the staff members who
> were there
> at the time. I have been trying to find ANY evidence this occurred, and
> have not
> been able to.
>
> CHM has the fast memory box from Stanford's PDP-6. It came from the
> Compaq donation
> to CHM of what they had in >> DEC's << internal collection, and was
NOT
> donated to
> the Boston Museum. As best as I've been able to determine, the 6 was
> sent to a DEC
> warehouse after the anniversary at DECUS, and sat there until what was
> there was
> sent to CHM. Since there is no record of this machine going to the
> Boston museum,
> nor does anyone there that I have talked to remember it coming there, it
> would have
> been difficult for them to have dismantled it. Every major donation to
> the Computer
> Museum was cataloged. I cannot find anything for Stanford's PDP-6 in
> their records
> or in the Museum Report, which at the time listed every donation they
> received.
>
> I would like to find someone INSIDE of DEC that saw it in while
> it was in the warehouse, but I haven't been able to locate anyone yet.
>
> The rumor of the Museum destroying the system started because their gift
> shop was selling
> modules, including the ALU modules from the PDP-6. I have been told
> these were from a
> collection of DEC module spares that DEC donated. I haven't been able to
> determine
> the earliest that they were being sold. If it was before the
> anniversary, they obviously
> could not have been from Stanford's machine.
>
> Because of this controversy, CHM has a policy that no artifacts will
> ever be offered for
> sale to the public. Items that are deacessioned are offered only to
> other non-profit
> institutions.
Thanks for the explanation; so 'there is no story', so to speak.