4 Jan
2007
4 Jan
'07
12:42 a.m.
Fred Cisin wrote:
Hell, no. I came up with the idea - you guys can bash out the details :-)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Jules Richardson wrote:
Hmm, interesting. It's not vintage unless you can download the code and run it
to find out if it's vintage or not. I like it :-)
We need a page reachable through the classiccmp
website which takes into
account things like:
nahh.
codable in FORTRAN and a few dozen assembly languages ...
... and then makes a call as to whether it will be seen by the list at large
as on-topic or not.
Do you have a formula to use for the algorithm?