Am 19 Oct 2005 11:23 meinte 'Computer Collector Newsletter':
>> So
what? correcting history, just because it was someones fart ?
Huh? You'd prefer they leave the mistake?
Yes, because the whole article is crap, and changing the most
obvious details doesn't help - but it makes it harder to use
the article as an example about how bad it is, that can be
understood by Joe Average.
Evan, I perfectly know the urge to correct such things. It's
the first that surfaces in my mind. But I also learnd that
interventing and correcting a few things isn't helpful at all.
The author will go ahead and write the next one with the same
sloopy research and again earn the money, while yll you get
is at best a soulless thank you (This thank you has been
printed by a computer and does not need to be signed...).
Gruss
(grumpy old) H.
--
VCF Europa 7.0 am 29/30.April und 01.Mai 2006 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/