>>>> "Ethan" == Ethan Dicks
<ethan.dicks at gmail.com> writes:
Ethan> On 7/19/05, Director <csmuseum at cse.uta.edu> wrote:
> Here's an URL for the image in question:
>
>
http://www.cse.uta.edu/TheMuseum at CSE/Whazat.html
Ethan> At 1/4" thick, there's a chance it's a DF32 platter. I don't
Ethan> remember how large the hub hole is, but at first glance, and
Ethan> with the PDP-8 suggestion, that's what I'd have to guess.
Ethan> I have never seen an RF08 platter, so I don't know how
Ethan> physically similar they are.
Is the RF08 like the RF11?
On second thought, that may be more like it. I forgot the size of the
RF64, but I don't think it was 16 inches diameter. (I though 8 inches
was diameter not radius...) For the RF11 that sounds just right. I
haven't ever seen an RS03 or RS04 platter; that's probably about the
same size as the RF11.
I don't think the RF11 had a ritation sensor. It had a clock/timing
track which encoded, among other things, the start of track mark.
There was a gap at that point. When reformatting the timing track (if
you replaced the platter, for example) you'd adjust a knob on the
timing track formatter until its indicator lights showed that the gap
length was within the required range.
paul