2 Jan
2018
2 Jan
'18
12:38 p.m.
On 2018-01-02 3:00 PM, David Bridgham via cctalk wrote:
On 01/02/2018 02:05 PM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
Well, I guess I thought the point was to produce a working replacement
for the disk drives that are nearly unobtainable but if it turns out
that lots of people are seriously interested in developing for the QSIC
itself, then I'll have to revisit that supposition.? In that case, I'd
probably write up more internals documentation than I would otherwise.
Err.. could be my mistake... I meant wherever you posted your last
technical note about QBus quirks. (I didn't look up the reference)
--Toby
Oh, I
hadn't thought of Toby possibly meaning that.? Yeah, I'm unlikely
to write up much documentation on the internals of the QSIC for people
who want to add other devices.? However, not only will the source be
Yes,
that's what I meant. In fact I thought that was the point of the
device :) Hope so. And there's always the blog?
Blog?? Is there a blog about the QSIC that I don't know about?? I'm not
much of a blogger but if you get me started talking about things that
interest me I tend to rattle on to excess.