20 Jan
2006
20 Jan
'06
6:18 p.m.
Fred Cisin wrote:
I vote for a good, hearty "HELL NO!"
At this point it's a request, not an order, and I hear that Google's
not inclined to meet it.
Doc
Chuck Guzis
wrote:
>I've been reading the story about the business of Justice subpoenaing the
>search records from Google for a week last summer. Google doesn't want to
>turn them over, but should they lose their appeal, why not turn the data
>over in the form of punched cards?
>This qualifies as "electronically readable media", doesn't it?
It'd
>probably be several truckloads and leave those guys at DOJ wondering what
>to do next...
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Naah. Paper tape is where it's at.
A judge might consider that to not be making a good faith effort to
comply.
Therefore, in the interests of "cooperating", it should be on magnetic
disk. But not necessarily specifying the disk size, nor format.
3.25" GCR ?