If you take the time to redesign this device, the simplest, lowest-risk,
easiest, cheapest, and least-exposed-to-copyright-infringement will be to
redesign the entire thing in a single CPLD or FPGA, on a board that matches
physically and logically, but in no way infringes on the copyright associated
with the artwork, which is what can be copyrighted.  Circuits themselves would
have to be patented, and, folks have found, that's a waste of time, since
generating a logical equivalent circumvents the patent, though not the PCB
copyright.
Once you have a prototype of your new replacement working, put the original on
eBay and take a vacation with the proceeds.   ... or don't ...
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Merchberger" <zmerch(a)30below.com>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: CoCo Xpndr1 (was: RE: Keep or assemble???
  Rumor has it that David Woyciesjes may have mentioned
these words:
  It sounds like you would get more enjoyment out
of building & using
it, rather that letting it sit and collect dust. If you're toying with
building it, I would say go for it, but keep all the packing and paperwork,
too. That helps increase the 'value'.
I think it all depends on whether you plan on selling it, or keeping it. I
would definitely build & use it. 
 [snippage, fore and aft...]
 I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the "reproducability" would be
 decreased once the kit is built... i.e. you can't [easily] scan the boards,
 or re-design them in AutoCad, etc...
 With this in mind, I was digging thru an old box of CoCo stuff I have and I
 came across (2) Xpndr1 expansion cards, 1 of which is virgin. A quick
 search of Google shows nothing about them...
 I've started re-designing the card in AutoCad (as if I didn't have *enough*
 projects ;-) with improvements. Some are minor, like putting the signal
 names on the top of the card instead of the bottom (so it's easier to see
 the signal names when I attach a small breadboard to the top of the
 card...) some are major (or going to be) like the extra room for standoffs
 so it'll be self-supporting, and also connector ports for both a "PC hard
 drive power port" and a "PC floppy drive power port" so you can power the
 thing from any PC power supply *or* an FD-50x power supply. I also plan on
 having one that buffers all of the data, address & major signal lines on
 the board, so that experimenting might be easier without blowing the entire
 CoCo bus.
 Which leads to my questions:
 A) Anybody know anything about the company that marketed these, as I don't
 want to intentionally break any copyright laws; but with no info on the
 internet & the extreme possibility of the company no longer existing, does
 anyone think I'll be in trouble with the law WRT copyright laws? I'm mainly
 just using the original as a pattern for (1) the signal names & pinouts,
 and (2) the dimensions of the connectors & pins (I didn't have anything
 else that had the ground pegs on either side of the connector).
 B) I can prolly find this out for myself, but there are many others here
 better than me on the hardware side of things: What would be some of the
 better [a.k.a more useful] buffer chips I could use to buffer the address &
 data busses?
 C) Are there any *real* problems with powering the card from a separate
 power supply? I'm assuming I need to tie the grounds together, but I
 wouldn't want the +5 / +12 / -12 volt rails tied at all -- they should be
 separate, right? [[no, I really don't feel like dissecting my MPI just
 yet... altho I think it's the *only* piece of computer equipment I've never
 taken apart! ]]
 Should I check the voltage levels of the power supply & the CoCo to see
 how close they are, or as long as they're both within TTL levels is it OK?
 I'm mainly worried about the PC supply being of a higher voltage than the
 CoCo, if that'll cause problems.
 =-=-=-=-
 The designs (when they get closer to completion) I will have on my website
 for free, but if I make several cards and someone else is dumb^H^H^H^H bold
 enough to purchase one I would sell them for a small profit...
 Anywho, thanks for listening, and double-thanks for any advice that others
 might be willing to offer... ;-)
 Roger "Merch" Merchberger
 --
 Roger "Merch" Merchberger   ---   sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
 Recycling is good, right???  Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
 If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
 disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.