Looking at the first diskette image, it ppears that it's been
corrupted somehow (the second one is fine). Take a look at cylinder
1, side 0, sector 1. Near the beginning of the directory we see the
entries for two files, FRAME1.MAP, FRAME1.PIX (2 extents)
0020 00 46 52 41 4d 45 31 20 20 4d 41 50 00 00 00 01
0030 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0040 00 46 52 41 4d 45 31 20 20 50 49 58 00 00 00 80
0050 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0060 00 46 52 41 4d 45 31 20 20 50 49 58 01 00 00 80
The extents continue for FRAME1.PIX:
00e0 00 46 52 41 4d 45 31 20 20 50 49 58 05 00 00 34
00f0 2c 2d 2e 2f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
And then we see a new file, FRAME2.PIX:
0100 00 46 52 41 4d 45 32 20 20 50 49 58 00 00 00 4e
0110 02 03 04 05 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
But it's allocated using the same clusters as the first two, i.e. 02
03 04 05 06! This is a problem. How did it get that way? Disks
swapped, OS bug; any number of other things. But it's clearly wrong.
One very ugly way I've seen for this to happen is for a rogue
application program to clear part of the BDOS allocation bitmnap in
CP/M.
We do have the definitions correct; note how the record count in byte
offset 0Fh in each directory entry agrees with the number of clusters
allocated. This ain't rocket science. 22Disk got it exactly right--
cluster 03 is double-allocated in the directory. I thought it better
that 22Disk stop complaining at the first message, since additional
warnings won't tell you anything you didn't already know.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I've seen this before--and
it's why 22Disk checks for stupid OS tricks like this--and CP/M
doesn't until something goes wrong.
Cheers,
Chuck