I learnt a lot
of things when getting my palindromic initials. Not to do
with particle physics eitehr (the group I was working in). Things like
how to strip down and rebuild a Canon CX printer. How to overhual a line
printer. How to design with ECL. How to get high-speed op-amps not to
turn into oscillators. How to fix SMPSUs. Etc...
mostly irrelevant, or even orthogonal to what they were trying to teach
you
A Ph.D., at least over here, is not really 'taught'. It's self-taught.
You are expected to fidn out hwat you need, solve problems, and so on.
That's the point of it.
So when I needed to print out a report and some idiot had fed normal
acetate sheets through the only laser printer (a CX), you can bet I
learnt how to strip it down and fix it.
And I am sur this knowledge (along with the other things I mentioned) has
been a lot more use to me than, say, understnading the weak interaction
(which I don't understand...). Problem is, people see I've got this bit
of paper that says 'particle physics' and assume I will understand the
weak interaction (which they don't need anybody to understand either)
anf don;'t assume I can understnad SMPSUs, electronic design, etc. Oh well...
Going to college will not prevent you from learning, and sometimes
provides unconnected opportunities.
Over here it's schools that seem to do their utmost to prevent learning.
Fortunately they were not successful with me...
-tony