5 Nov
2011
5 Nov
'11
7:56 p.m.
On 11/05/2011 07:33 PM, leaknoil wrote:
On 11/5/2011 3:43 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
Grrrrr, ok. We definitely agree on that point, though I would
honestly say VMS 5 would actually give them a run for their money. But
apart from the specifics of that argument, much of the other stuff
you're spouting off about is wildly, incredibly incorrect. And they're
not really matters of opinion.
You're going to stick to it, and that's fine. It's your professional
reputation on the line, not mine. Personally I think it's better to
have correct information than to see the world for how we want it to be
and insist that that's the way it is. You are wearing blinders.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
New Kensington, PA
Ok. On that we can agree. I'm sorry for the
intensity of my flamage.
There's a lot going on here lately and I'm in more of a "knee-jerk
reaction" state of mind than usual. -Dave
I don't think I have ever disagreed with you actually. My issue was
always with the version 5 is secure crowd. It was never a VMS vs UNIX
thing but, a 1988 OS vs a 2011 OS.
It doesn't matter and I apologize if I offended you. I only meant to
offend people that think VMS 5 is as secure as say Solaris 10 or Debian.