19 Oct
1998
19 Oct
'98
10:08 a.m.
Marty(a)itgonline.com (Marty) writes:
I've never seen any other pc that used these 128k
(64k dip dram
piggy-backed) chips. Regarding the numbers of the chips, they were
standard 64k dip drams, the IBM part number is long lost on me.
The 64K DRAM dies were of course standard, but weren't they packaged
in 18-pin DIPs rather than the usual 16-pin, so that the top and bottom
parts could have their RAS and/or CAS lines bonded out to different
pins?
If you just stack two normal DRAMs, you don't get anything useful.
Eric