Industry folks say that the lifetime of electrolytic capacitors is about fourteen years.
Since the filter caps in our machines were significantly (i.e. TWICE) older than that (and
some showed physical symptoms of degradation), we replaced them rather than deal with them
one by one as they failed. In our experience with our PDP-10 machines, this was (despite
its cost) cheap insurance against periodic failures, which can occasionally be
catastrophic.
The foam on the doors not only serves to cut down on dust into the machine, it also cuts
down on the noise in the machine room. That makes me happy. :-) Yes, the machines can
be run without it. But since our goal is restoration, we'll replace it - and yes,
replace it again in ten or fifteen years.
We *are* running the machine off three separate 110V single-phase circuits - apparently
you missed that part. Despite your opinion that "it should be obvious", as good
engineering practice I wanted to understand how the machine was using the input power
before making assumptions. I'd rather spend some time in due diligence than in damage
control - or fire fighting! Also, since our interest is historical restoration, we wanted
to make use of the PDU as wired rather than try to bypass it with some sort of approach
that would feed 110V directly to the various elements. You may be completely correct
about how buildings are wired, but our building isn't wired that way. The EE on our
team came up with an approach that's working for us.
That raises an interesting point I forgot to mention: it's important to determine that
the various subsystems are properly plugged into the PDU. When we first tried to bring up
the machine, it would pop the main breaker. After some head-scratching, we determined
that this was because the fan for the memory subsystem wasn't plugged into an
unswitched outlet. If that fan isn't running, there's a signal from an airflow
sensor that trips the main breaker!
Yes, if the OS doesn't boot that means you have a problem - but what problem? DEC
designed these diagnostics to tell you where that problem lies. I chose to minimize my
variables. Chalk it up to a dozen years as a software quality assurance manager at
Microsoft. Given the expectations of the people who sign my paycheck, I chose the
conservative route.
I disagree with your opinion on scoping the power supply outputs. In my colleagues'
work with the PDP-10s we have, they found that 'weird' problems were often caused
by an unexpectedly unfiltered DC line - and DCOK didn't cop to it. I have clean power
- under load - to this machine.
We have a valid 6.2 license, which is a 'period' OS for this machine. As to your
assertion that we would be fine using the hobbyist license with 7.2: I'm not a lawyer,
are you? I have used the 7.2 hobbyist release and PAKs for a number of years on several
of my own VAXen at home. But this is not 'at home' and I know my 6.2 license is
legal and proper.
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
Patrick Finnegan [pat at
computer-refuge.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:06 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: hams on classiccmp
From: brad at
heeltoe.com [brad at
heeltoe.com]
Ian King wrote:
I just got a VAX-11/780-5 up with VMS on
TCP/IP....
very nice. Can you describe how it went? Was the 780 previously
in moth balls?
-brad
On Saturday 17 January 2009, Ian King wrote:
This machine was one of a pair bought from a collector
who bought
from a collector who bought from...? It was interesting noting the
differences between the two: for instance, on one the black foam was
in fairly good shape (replaced it anyway), but on the other it was
falling off in chunks. Both seemed in good mechanical condition.
The next step was to ensure electrical integrity.
FWIW, if you can be sure you're going to operate the machine in a
relatively clean environment (eg, no carpeting or other things to
generate dust), I'd forgo the filter foam, as all it'll do is crumble
and block airflow.
So I replaced every electrolytic capacitor of
consequence in the
switching power supplies - five in one machine, six in the other -
plus the LSI-11 boot machine and RX01 boot floppy. This was
expensive!
This also seems unnecessary if the capacitors were still good. The
11/780 I got up and running has one bad psu (de-asserts DCOK every once
in a while, and causes the machine to reboot) which may be bad
capacitors, but everything else was ok, despite being stored for over
10 years.
After all of this, we carefully brought up the
machine. We had a
challenge because 120V three phase doesn't seem to be usual practice
in US wiring - we had 240V three phase, but that obviously wasn't
going to do us any good! Carefully looking through the power
distribution unit's engineering drawings, it became clear that DEC
used three-phase simply to balance the current load among the legs -
in fact, everything runs on 120V. So we used equal care in reviewing
the wiring of the warehouse where we keep these machines and found
three outlets that were (a) on the same side of the 240V mains and
(b) not sharing a breaker and circuit. Those were connected to a
three-phase outlet, the VAXen were plugged in and voila! NOTE: we
have a team member experienced with commercial power circuits. Don't
try this at home - or if you do, be very very careful and be certain
that, from any of the three live blades to another, you don't have
more than 120V.
First, I want to point out that all of the power outlets on the PDU are
120V, 20A (NEMA 5-20R) outlets, so it should be somewhat obvious from
that, that the machine doesn't need three phase power to run, no
engineering drawings required. :)
Also, your statements about three phase power aren't quite valid. You
may have had three-phase 240V, but that is unlikely, the typical
practice in the US for non-motor loads (lighting, general power usage)
is 120/208V three phase or 120/240V single phase. In normal use, the
three phase connections on the VAX PDU have 208V between them, and 120V
to ground, which is a standard 120/208V three phase system.
You can run the machine off of single phase power by chosing up to three
separate 120V circuits - it's ok if they're on different phases, having
240V phase-to-phase is OK - and running each one to a different phase,
and tying all the neutrals together to the neutral in the machine. In
fact, it is a good idea to make sure that you have different phases, so
that you minimize the neutral current, otherwise you may end up with
melted wiring or fire, and selecting opposite phases will do this for
you, as the netural current from opposite phases will cancel either
other out.
Fortunately, an 11/780 doesn't draw nearly the outlet/PDU rating; I
think I measured around 24A total draw at 120V from all three phases on
mine, and load didn't raise that too much. I've run it from three 15A
circuits (in a building with 120/208V power that I'm not allowed to put
in my own outlet for it ;), and it was ok, each phase was around 8A
max.
Now that the machines would power up, I scoped all the
power supply
voltages to ensure they were really DC, i.e. that I hadn't missed an
important filter cap anywhere. All good, so I tried booting from the
floppies we got with the machines.
Fun. I'd suggest putting a scope (or even better a one-shot that
triggers when they go off) "DCOK" and "ACOK" outputs from the PSUs as
more important; checking voltages with a DMM is probably more useful.
I was able to get the basic
console to boot - hooray! - but was unable to get the
microdiagnostics to run. We had agreed that successful execution of
the low-level diagnostics was a precursor to any attempt to install
the OS, so this was a roadblock.
Your OS is probably the best diagnostic that you have. If it doesn't
boot, or crashes, there's something wrong, which you can pick a precise
diagnostic to examine the problem. Diagnostics sometimes find problems
that don't really exist, and miss things that are show-stoppers.
We had CDROM media for OpenVMS 6.2, the latest version
certified for
the VAX-11/785
7.x works fine.
Now we were cooking with gas. I had a valid VMS
license but not a
UCX license.
You should be able to use the hobbyist license, unless you're planning
on running the machine commercially.
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing ---
http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge ---
http://computer-refuge.org