(Hopefully this is on-topic since the technologies and hardware are over
a decade old)
Background: I rescued two DLT 7000 drives this weekend (one Quantum, one
SUN) and hooked them up to an Adaptec 29160 HBA. The Adaptec has an
external 50-pin (Ultra 2?) connector, so I used a 50-to-68 pin (Ultra
wide SCSI?) cable to connect the HBA to the first DLT drive, and a
68-pin to connect both DLT drives together. It took a bit of
configuring in the Adaptec BIOS (had all targets set to U160 16-bit) but
after some sane reductions they both were recognized and speed was set
to 10MB/s.
My concern is that it takes nearly two hours to fill a DLT IV (35GB)
tape, regardless of which drive I use or HBA settings I configure. The
Quantum drive averages 4168 kB/s; the SUN drive is slower and averages
3355 kB/s. Are these times normal? With such large capacities per
tape, I would have assumed they could be filled faster... They are
reporting a 10MB/s speed, why am I getting only 4MB/s?
Another question: Is it normal for DLT drives to go faster if
compression is disabled? I thought the point of hardware compression
was that it came without cost. I'm running a test now, but was curious
to know if other drives were known for being "slower" with compression on.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at
oldskool.org)
http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:
http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at
http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars:
http://trixter.wordpress.com/