23 Mar
2005
23 Mar
'05
11:18 a.m.
I fully agree that the article wasn't very good, but Tom, I know you're more
reasonable than this: you're directly accusing the magazine of including Sony
because they are an advertiser??
C'mon...
--- Tom Jennings <tomj at wps.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Roger Merchberger wrote:
Computer magazines are pretty consistently worthless today -- they
know only about sales. They could be selling wicker baskets, same
difference. New! Improved! Same but no different!
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the (free!) Computer Collector Newsletter
- 700 readers and no spam / Publishes every Monday / Write for us!
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
Their idea of the 13 "critical
machines" to me is disappointing - The Sony
Picturebook at best has had minimal market impact and is rarely seen
outside
Japan;
But Sony is probably a big advertiser. It's pretty much as simple
as that.
If you don't pick at it, it doesn't hurt :-)