On 12/12/2014 07:24 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
LOTS of SCSI devices violated the standard protocol in
interesting
ways. My understanding is there are two classes of SCSI drives. One
class used a scheme that was quite like old 9-track tapes, so that
there was essentially no formatting that wrapped around the user
data. So, there would be a physical gap with no magnetic transitions
between the written user data blocks. There would be a CRC of some
sort at the end of the user data. Higher-end drives wrapped the user
data into a more complex format, so each block would have a block
size and a sequence number at the beginning, and maybe a trailer of
the same info with the CRC. Often in these systems, there would be
NO physical gap. This increased data capacity, but made it
impossible to rewrite a single tape block. The file mark was just a
special block with minimal or zero-length data packet.
This is a bog-standard 1600 PE density 9 track tape on a 10.5" reel.
So no surprises in the physical format. Just some screwball controller
programming.
--Chuck