21 Apr
1999
21 Apr
'99
9:03 a.m.
> >And again, more questions:
> >If I'm right at Megans description, she just include the next lower
> >digit when it comes to these subtraction rules, and your Algo seams
> >to be weak at the same point. Let me give an example:
> >49 would be normaly coded as IL (always remember, it was kind of a
> >system to reduce writing as much as possible - there are even examples
> >where the number 248 is written CIIL) while Megan seams to code it as
> >XXXXIX - basicly wrong - or did I miss something ? I'm not realy
> >what one can call a DEC-Geek.
> I guess I'm unclear as to whether any numeral can be used to reduce
> the value of a higher, subsequent numeral.
> Using your explanation, 1999 would be MIM,
instead of the more
> standard (as I have seen it) MCMXCIX.
[...compression ideas of Roman Numerals...]
While out for lunch, I've seen a light ... erh ... I've seen
where Megan took the impression that the Roman system is kind
of a BCD like system (or better RCD :) - each decimal digit is
encoded using Roman Numerals (with an inclusion of the digit
position) - but that was never the system - position dependant
coding (like our arabic/indic system) was alien to the Numeral
system. Maybe some decimal adjusted (DAA) persons where building
the examples she is refering.
Gruss
H.
--
Stimm gegen SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK