On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:09PM +0000, Sellam Ismail wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Michael Nadeau wrote:
The classic computing hobby aside, The CBDTPA is
stupid on a number of
levels. Most electronics manufacturers are against it, for example. They
say it will discourage innovation and slow the development of new
products. Civil libertarians oppose it for potential privacy issues and
its likelihood of impeding the free flow of information.
And besides, it's unimplementable. Mostly due to the fact that someone
will ALWAYS find a way around the "protection".
<soapbox>
And under this braindead law, the aforementioned someone has just
earned himself up to 5 years in jail. Really clever idea - just put
all those pesky hardware/software hackers in jail. This also nicely kill
the opensource scene which is just threatening the profits of companies
producing and selling commercial quality *cough* *cough* software.
And when everybody had his computer forcibly exchanged for a click-and-drool
webtv appliance, the vendor can activate the suicide timer which renders
the box inoperable after one or two years, forcing the customer to get a
recycled^Wnew one - for plenty of cash of course - in regular intervals.
Solves the problem of those pesky non-cooperating users who insist on not
buying the newest crap as soon as it hits the shelves.
Of course, after a few years, the hot top of the line computer
development will happen in China and not the US, but hey - the
politicians who supported this law will then no longer be in the
office, so why should they care?
Unfortunately, this kind of short-sighted "lets secure our profits now
and let others deal with the fall out" idiocy seems to be rather
widespread :-(
</soapbox>
Regards,
Alex.
--
We're gonna be body guards for teen rock-stars. Wouldn't the cause of freedom
be better served if we killed them instead?
-- Schlock from the ''Schlock Mercenary'' comic
strip