8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
2:27 p.m.
Jules wrote:
That was in interesting point raised in an article
that I saw; why did
Apple go for Intel and not AMD? AMD chips tend to be cheaper, plus they
seem to always be slightly ahead of the game when it comes to
performance and innovation (which seems to fit in more with Apple's
roots).
There's no reason to believe that they won't use AMD chips. Intel has
a better low-power product for laptops (Pentium M/Celeron), and that's
what they are starting with.