Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 19:41:01 +1
Reply-to: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
From: "Hans Franke" <franke(a)sbs.de>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: 64bit data 128Bit address...Re: Building a Z-80 (64bit!
>> "Max Eskin"
<maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Snip!
The size isn't the real problem - you already get
16 Gig in less
than 320 cm^3 (using hard disk technology) which is more than
100 Meg per cm^3, which gives us 100x100x100x100 Meg or 100 Tera
per m^3 (Only heat will be a problem, but if we assume that this
will shrink by the factor 2 within the next few years, we get
enough space for cooling without developing a new technology).
100 Tera are 100x2^40 Bytes so, for 16 exabytes you need
10x2^18 m^3 or 64x64x64x10 m^3 - just the size of a ordinary
160 store skyscraper. Nothing real big - isn't it? - and especialy
not a mountain. and if we assume a increasing density by 10 within
the next years, it is less than a warehouse.
This is all just (near) todays technology - the real problem
is the access time .... A wire could come up to 100m between
a starage device at the perhipherieal area and a 64 Bit computer
in the middle - 100m thats just 1/3.000.000s or 333ns traveling
time ... seams we have created some kind of piplineing prior
to the CPU :) So, calulating a 1 us round trip time, we just
could runn a 4 MHz Z80 ... hmm didn't he ask for 64 Bit Z80 ?
(I just left the disc acces time out of calculation, but acording
to any information availabel from disk manufacturers the internal
caches will eliminate this almost to zero :)
Gruss
Hans
Not so...
We can have 1 Terabytes now.
Seagate just announced their new drives in 3.5" I think in 50GB.
Use 20 of them and still fit in 1 minicomputer box. And can be run
off the 15A 115VAC or two plus the computer iteslf. :)
Jason D.
email: jpero(a)cgocable.net
Pero, Jason D.