Segin wrote:
  Jules Richardson wrote:
  At some point it has to be accepted that people
need a little
 education to use a computer - so I don't see why a rudimentary
 understanding of how computers operate shouldn't be one of them. 
 That won't happen as long as Microsoft exists. 
 I suspect it won't happen as long as people exist :-)  Companies do it
 to make more profit based on the assumption that most people are just
 too darn lazy to bother learning anything about their surroundings. If a
 company produces a product that makes it possible for a consumer to
 somehow muddle through in 80% of cases without any basic knowledge then
 they'll sell more of that product. Never mind that the consumer is
 tearing their hair out for the other 20% of the time - it's their own
 fault, after all.
 Problem then lies in that those of us who *want* to use the product to
 its maximum potential are left with something compromised because it's
 been dumbed down for mass appeal.
 Microsoft are certainly one of the worst culprits, if not the worst. But
 there are plenty of others who are equally guilty.
 Luckily there are still a few companies around who take pride in what
 they offer and do produce goods that need a few braincells to operate
 but result longer-term in higher efficiency or greater savings.
 Unfortunately they're becoming increasingly rare :-(
 Hmm OK, rant over :)
  
Not exactly true on the "rare" bit -- More and more people are switching
to UNIX and UNIX-like operating systems to escape the tyrany of
Microsoft. I would LOVE to see someone use  UNIX box like Windows and
have their machine survive.
--
The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
        -- Linus Torvalds