13 Dec
2011
13 Dec
'11
12:40 p.m.
On 12/13/2011 09:34 AM, David Riley wrote:
Really? Vs. over the air over any appreciable distance? Seems unlikely to me, but
I'm not really an RF guy.
Oh you're absolutely right; I thought you were saying RF had less
propagation loss over coax than video over coax. My apologies for my
misinterpretation of what you said.
Haha, yes, the difference is important. I knew that, but it came out backwards.
I figured as much; just mentioning it for the sake of our
frequently-searched archives. I'm well aware that you Know Your
Stuff(tm). :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
New Kensington, PA
Oh, I realized he meant the modulated outputs from a
computer/console. Yeah, same signal, less propagation loss over
coax.
The RF? More propagation loss, not less. And it's really just the composite video signal
modulated by a
carrier;
Carrier modulated by the composite video signal, actually. (sorry)