After all, it
did immeasurable damage to western civilization
to have unfettered access to the intellectual property of
Shakespeare, Newton, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, and Babbage.
We ceratinly wouldn't want to make the same mistake with
Mickey Mouse and Excel.
Or Gershwin, Ellington, Shostakovitch, Britten, Vaughan Williams....
Oh, wait--those are all still under copyright, aren't they? Yup,
you;'re right--*nobody* even knows of much less enjoys their work
today because of that nasty copyright law.
I take your point. However, it implies that I was not sufficiently
specific. I do not argue that copyrights are bad because they
ensure that there will be no access to creative works. As you point
out, that is clearly not the result of legal restrictions on the
flow of knowledge. Rather I argue that to impose a restriction on
an activity, that activity should be counter to the interests of
society. Free communication of ideas is not counter to the interests
of society. Copyright and patent restrictions as they exist today
are not well-justified. Lest I be again unclear, I am not suggesting
that all forms of legal support for the desires of authors and inventors
are inappropriate. I am suggesting that the set of laws that currently
exist and the way in which they are currently being applied are
inappropriate in the context of today's society and technology.
Did you know that Handel swore off writing Italian
opera because he
was widely pirated?
Better not to write the stuff if it's going to be stolen.
That's actually the point. When I put an idea or a creative expression
out there, I cannot say ahead of time whether it will be used in a
beneficial way or a detrimental way. I mean that both in the sense
of not being able to predict the results and not being able to dictate
the uses. If indeed I have such a strong objection to my work being
transmitted without proper attribution or even with another claiming
credit, then my emotional health would be better served by not making
the work available at all, regardless of the government's involvement.
A law that dictates what happens for 75 years after my death doesn't
significantly change my motivations for making my work available.
BLS