11 May
2005
11 May
'05
11:43 a.m.
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Paul Koning wrote:
Hm. Algol 60 certainly has no OO nature. Algol 68
does, the
beginnings of it.
I don't mean to imply anyone in 1964 saw this, I'm only saying
after looking at the compiler design it seemed 'obvious' to me
language extentions to accomodate scope at the top level could fit
without ruining it.