On 3/7/2013 9:59 AM, Dennis Boone wrote:
Either one at
10" diameter is an impressively long scale, for a LOT of
accuracy!
The accuracy builds up surprisingly slowly as the scale lengthens.
De
That was why I had both a 4" and the monster. The jump up in accuracy w
both expensive and large to the detriment of being able to have it with
me as I schelped from class to class. I didn't want to damage the
legend on the large one, and it was already huge in itself. And there
was only a lambskin leather cover for it which wouldn't do with everyday
carrying. It could have used a hard case, but then would have become
like the old "luggable" systems of pre laptop days. You could have
carried it, but would not want to. And I don't mean as large as the
luggable, just the choice was not real, you would not want one in your
sack of stuff in a hard case.
Fred, you stretched my head when you said helix vs. spiral. do you get
a helix on a flat plane with just lines on it? I thought helix would be
cylinder ruled with a line. maybe I'm taking what you meant out of
context and you were referring back to the cylindrical devices. I would
think the helix would be quite a bit harder to navigate than the
spiral. at least on the spiral, you could always see the entire
picture, whereas with the helix / cylinder you'd end up with only
viewing a stack of legends on a side, part of the helix at any one given
time. knowing which vertical one to pick on which cursor could get to
be fun.
thanks
Jim