22 Oct
2001
22 Oct
'01
1:44 p.m.
Thats how my old address was destroyed. Likely this one too in time.
Does little good to have a valid address if the address has to be dumped
due to
being a spam trap.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: List Maintenance
list.
On Oct 22, 12:39, Sellam Ismail wrote:
talking
But for people using the archives for research it
would be nice to be
able
> to e-mail the original poster (unless the address obscuring we're about will not
completely remove the e-mail address from the message).
I agree; it's been useful to me on a number of occasions, both when I've
searched for something and when someone else has found me through the I wouldn't want my address removed, just altered
enough so automatic
spambots won't get my address too often.
OTOH, it's possible that my additional spam collection has come from
Usenet
trawling rather than list archives, I suppose.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York