enough already (was: digital camera capabilities)

(apparently in response to Jay's request to bring this thread about cameras back on topic) Paxton Hoag wrote: [ more blah blah blah about camera equipment excised ] You are so right; carry on. That reminds me, often when I am hobbying with my vintage computers I can hear my wife watching TV in the next room. Can you believe what happened on last week's episode of Lost? This morning, just after walking past my Northstar Horizon, I read today's newspaper. There was a really interesting article about Roe vs Wade and how the aging supreme court is likely to have a lot of turnover in the next few years. What is everybody's opinion on this vital subject? Back in 1992 or so, I recall some character at work bringing in a floppy for the Apple II. When nobody was looking, he booted it up. Lo and behold, it was a very solarized, low framerate video of a certain sex act. It was really technically impressive ... the programming, that is :-) . Let's all talk about our pornography preferences. We must have at least a few experts on the list that can share their insights. Yes, this thread started on topic -- what camera is suitable/useful for photographing the equipment of this hobby we share. That relatedness lasted about three messages. Since then 95% of what has come out has been war stories and shop talk having NOTHING to do with vintage computers, other than the authors happen to be interested in both and can't resist the temptation to demonstrate it. And before anybody else mentions it, yes, I do believe my infrequent curmudgeonly posts to get back on track are starting to outnumber my classic computer posts. So, to help balance things out, if you've read this far, and are interesting in paying shipping on a working dual head multiprocessing Z80 turbodos system (from austin, tx, usa), let me know. Specifically it is an IMS 5000 IS system. Preference goes to anybody willing to come and pick it up. You are excluded from consideration if you have authored any emails with the subject line "digital camera capabilities" *. * (not really)