On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:38:19 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
I did not write what was quoted below as being from
me. I think a
couple paragraphs got dropped or something. I don't have the original
article that shows who it should be correctly attributed to.
--jc
Somehow it looks like attribution, and your comment in the thread, got
snipped out of the response from woodelf. Your 'part' in the thread
was:
----
<URL=
http://www.jaywalk.co.uk/pdp8/vhdl/> Google for "PDP8 VHDL".
There's lots of hits.
---
I was able to reach back to the original article only because I'v found
a great email client (sylpheed) that threads the discussions here. I'd
be lost without it.
woodelf wrote:
> Scott Stevens wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
>> "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
>> 40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here.
>(the> date code on the ones I have is 8001).
>>
>> (googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy
>websites,> though)
>>
>>
> Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark room timer'
>
>>
http://artm-friends.at/rm/foto/duka.html
>