23 Sep
2004
23 Sep
'04
5:37 p.m.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1307810,00.html
That's one of the articles , make your own mind up.
Geoff.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe R." <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
To: "Geoffrey Thomas" <geoffreythomas(a)onetel.com>om>; "General
Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: I don't believe it!!! Jeanne
from
At 05:56 AM 9/23/04 +0100, you wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
><cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:20 AM
>Subject: Re: I don't believe it!!! Jeanne
>
>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
>>
>> > According to my Observer newspaper , Nader gets a lot of funding from
>Mr.
>> > Bush's backers.
>> > So who were you really voting for ?
>>
>> Read between the lines. Ask yourself, "why?" It's more cynical
than
you
>> think.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
>Festival
>
>Yes I know , the paper said that they're funding Nader because he pulls a
>lot of Democrat votes rather than Republican , thus swinging things
Bush's
way.
Exit polls have CONSISTANTLY shown that Nader takes more votes away the Republican than from the Democrats. I've
heard CLAIMS that the
republicans secretly finance Nader but I neve seen any proof and I don't
beleive the claims.
Joe