On Sep 18, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Pete Turnbull <pete at dunnington.plus.com> wrote:
On 18/09/2013 17:34, David Riley wrote:
On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Pete Turnbull
<peter.turnbull at york.ac.uk> wrote:
Anyone got practical experience of substituting
for an 8881?
My best solution has been
to just use discrete SMD FETs on the output side
Well, I want something that fits an existing IC socket, and for the
moment I'm thinking if one 7401 doesn't have the oomph, piggyback a
second.
That could work, as long as you're not causing fanout problems for
the devices driving the 7401.
The problem
is that the 7408 has a different pinout than the 7401/8881 (the gates are
reversed).
I think you mean a 7438 -- right drive capacity, wrong layout.
I meant a 7408 (non-OC) as an AND gate to drive a separate transistor
to make the open-collector gate. It's not a great solution.
Your other
option would be making NAND gates with individual transistors:
I've not really looked, but aren't there any single SMD NAND gates that
would fit four to a small piece of real estate?
There are, but you'll likely have the same problem; they're not usually
designed to drive/sink that much current. A dual FET in a tiny SMD
package will essentially be a NAND gate if you wire one source to the
other drain. If you have time to spin a tiny PCB, that's probably an
ideal solution. I can point to some good choices if you'd like, though
you'd have to verify that they're available quickly with your preferred
distributor.
- Dave