Electrolytics caps: standard cctech recurring topic #2
I swear this concern about electrolytic cap failure is a legacy myth that has
filtered down through the antique radio community, going back to issues of wet
electrolytics and *early* dry ones.
For pre-1950's tube equipment and later *consumer-grade* *tube* equipment I may
replace electrolytic (and paper) caps as a matter of course. Just about
everything else is left as is.
My (industrial-grade) tube frequency counters from the late-1950s are
functioning fine with the original electrolytic caps in them. In one of these
counters there was a bad oil-filled bathtub cap (one of the most reliable types
of that era). The electrolytics were fine.
Pretty much all (I can't think of any exceptions offhand) of my dozens of
transistor and IC counters, calculators (and computers) from the 60's and 70's
are functioning with the original electrolytic caps in them.
Occasionally, I will bother to use a variac.
I have had one 'lytic cap explode on me. That was in a home-made tube radio
power supply from the 1950's that I received in the 90's. Made quite a mess.
The mushy innards of the capacitor were splattered around the entire underside
of the chassis. That situation would have been worthy of initial replacement or
a variac, but I didn't have one at the time.
The issue of poor-quality 'lytic caps from the late-1990's/early-2000's is
well
known in the industry, but that was a quality issue related to several
particular manufacturers (example article:
http://crppit.epfl.ch/documentation/Computer/Hardware/Problem/Defect%20Main…).
Aside from such particular issues as this, IMHO, concern over modern
electrolytic caps is vastly overrated.