In article <200610202259.k9KMxJjM007895 at
keith.ezwind.net>,
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk writes:
I don't like to rely too heavily on
Wikipedia
as (like alot of information online) you can't
be sure what's right or wrong, unless someone
knowledgeable in the subject can confirm it.
I haven't seen any glaring mistakes yet, just the occasional spelling
error or typo, which I correct.
I just had a long running argument with a clown that insisted that
interpreted BASIC on a PCjr was as fast as compiled BASIC because the
original BASIC compiler wasn't up to snuff in his opinion.
I find the pages related to math and science are reasonable, but after
that little encounter I'm a little more skeptical about Wiki. Colbert
was right when he coined 'Wikiality'.
Mike