-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
 Van: cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org
 [mailto:cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org] Namens Tony Duell
 Verzonden: maandag 22 juni 2009 22:04
 Aan: cctalk at 
classiccmp.org
 Onderwerp: Re: How to lose most of an an entire collection in one shot
  > I am sure yuo realise why I prefer the
series 200 to the series
 > 300...
 > Perhaps I am being unkind -- the only 9000/300 machine I'ev been
 > inside is the model 340, and it seemed to be stuffed with
 > unrecognisable PGA-packaged ICs. At least the series 200s  
 are mostly
  > standard parts with the odd PAL, ROM and
microcontroller  
 thrown in.
 The processor and memory boards of the 350/360 are build  
 from TTL and
  PAL's(lots of them) 
 Right... As I said, I've only been inside the 9000/340 (I
 have a number of those that I was given, all with high-res
 video boards, and IIRC, 16M RAM.). Somewhere I have an
 interface board for an external video box, the different back
 panel that goes with that, and a little cardcage you can fit
 to that backpanel that has a DIO slot).  
Is it for the Graphic coprocessor ?
That's an external unit you place next to the system unit, it connects to
somekind of bus extender board with a flatcable.
  I just fixed a 16Mb memoryboard for my 360 by
reverse eng.  
 the memory
  decoding and buffering circuits.
 The interface board contains 1 big pga i/o chip  
 (propriarity hp) but
  the rest is TTL and some LSI-chips. 
 Custom LSI, or things I might have heard of? It's not the PGA
 package I oject to per se, rather it's the fact I can't get
 data or replacements for some of the ICs. 
 
One custom LSI I think it's the I/O controller.
The others are Lance Ethernet Ti HP-IB controller HIL-chip, serial
controller 1820-3623 and some other standaard interface chips. The only one
that would bother you would be the HP 1TQ4-0401.
I'll make some pictures this week and put them on flickr so you can look at
them.
  The hi-res video boards are build from pga's
and ram, but  
 you use also
  older video boards Or plant a 68030
acceleratorboard in a  
 HP 9816, you
  wouldn't beleivbe your eyes how fast the
thing gets then ;-) 
 I can believe it :-). Actually the 12.5MHz 68010 in the
 9836CU and 9817 feels noticeably faster than the normal 8MHz
 68000. I assume it's just due to the 1.5* clock speed.
 The 345/375 and 382 types are more 'modern'and build in SMD  
 with a lot
  of special function chips.
 But the 345 has a 68040 emulator board wit a 68030 implemented.
 So please don't throw them all away because of a few pga's ;-) 
 As if I would :-) 
 
I know.
 I worked on mine it had a bad video/terminal ram chip,  
 thanks to the
  diagnostic LED's it was easy to find. 
 Right.
  With not very handy I was refering to the use of
the  
 machine, and it
  is big takes a lot of space. 
 Yes, I ahev a 2623 terminal (same case) somewhere -- I
 borrowed the keyboard from it as a possible keyboard for the
 HP120 (I described that work a couple of months back). I must
 extract the terminal iteself sometime and have a serious look
 at the insides. 
 
I know was fun reading the story.
Hardware problems are always 'fun' ;-)
  -tony
  
Rik